Tags
California theater Sherlock the Ripper, Conan Doyle was Jack the Ripper, Jack the Ripper exposed
The real Sherlock Holmes was Jack the Ripper and I want all the world to know it. The media and Hollywood have been raking in the cash for a century now based on the works of an infamous serial killer — Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
I was giving out flyers to the people who were going into the California Theater in Berkeley on Christmas Day to see the movie Sherlock Holmes. The flyer links to: Jack the Ripper was Arthur Conan Doyle where I finally state in plain language some of the clues that Doyle left to this series of homicides.
This Sherlock episode will probably distract me from my more important works, such as The EarthArk Project, but my energy is slackening and if I don’t do it now it will never get done. I have known since 1989 that Doyle was Jack the Ripper but didn’t want to spoil the good time being had by all those people reading his stories. But along with the good that Doyle did, for which he deserves high praise, there was a great deal of harm which he also did and that deserves great condemnation.
Over a century later there will be very few who will have known any of the participants in these events so it is time for the exposure to begin. There will be many more mysteries soon to be cleared up. Doyle kept up this hidden work until his death in 1930 so there is vastly more to be found and revealed.
Arthur Conan Doyle was a much more interesting person than any of his fictional creations.
Pingback: The evolution of my thoughts is getting wierder. « Probaway – Life Hacks
Pingback: The EarthArk Project index page list by date « Probaway – Life Hacks
John Martin, AKA Malik Mubashshir said:
Sir, I just came upon your VERY interesting series of articles about ACD, Jack the Ripper and Sherlock Holmes. I wonder if you have read Michael Dibden’s novel, The Last Sherlock Holmes Story? If not, you should definitely read it. It is a brilliantly written pastiche that relates to your theory in a fascinating way – especially when Dr. Watson has to pause and ask himself what exactly does he know about Holmes’ psychology and the motives for his interest in crime. I will say no more, except that many reviewers were outraged by Dibden’s portrayal of Holmes. I thought his psychological exploration of the weird/eccentric detective ACD had created was profound. The novel still haunts me. You should develop your theory into a book. BTW, the similarity between the recreated image of the Ripper based on witnesses and the face of ACD is obvious. I would like to correspond with you further.
osloensis said:
can you please repeat the exact evidence for this, point by point? spare us of speculations. provable facts, please.
probaway said:
osloensis – You can do a good search for details by putting the word RIPPER in the search box at the top of the blog.
Pingback: December 2009 – Probaway.wordpress.com – web posts | Probaway - Life Hacks
Pingback: Condensed thoughts from Probaway’s January 2009 blog posts | Probaway - Life Hacks