Garrett Hardin (1915 – 2003) — American ecologist and human population control promoter. The optimum population is less than the maximum.
Probaway maximizing on Garrett Hardin
1. Ecologists are hated because they contradict the prime directives of nature for every living individual to survive in any way possible and reproduce as much as possible.
As reflected in his famous essay “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Garrett Hardin’s idea revolves around the concept that individuals acting solely in their self-interest can ultimately lead to the degradation and depletion of shared resources. While ecologists may be perceived as challenging this innate drive for survival and reproduction, their work emphasizes the importance of long-term sustainability and the collective well-being of ecosystems. By studying and advocating for responsible resource management, ecologists aim to protect and preserve the delicate balance of nature, ensuring the survival and prosperity of not just individual species but the entire interconnected web of life. Therefore, while their message may go against our immediate instincts, it is rooted in the wisdom of understanding the broader consequences of unchecked exploitation and the need for thoughtful stewardship.
2. Any individual can deny that they have obligations to the future other than to survive, reproduce, and care for their offspring.
While this perspective may resonate with our innate instincts, it fails to recognize the interconnectedness of human societies and the long-term consequences of our actions. The wisdom lies in acknowledging that our choices and behaviors have implications beyond our immediate needs and desires. By embracing a sense of responsibility towards the future, we can adopt sustainable practices, preserve resources, and ensure future generations’ well-being. This broader perspective highlights the wisdom of considering the long-term impacts of our actions rather than being solely driven by immediate self-interest.
3. Any attack on adult humans’ animal rights is an attempt to murder their children.
It implies that our primal instincts to protect and care for our offspring are closely intertwined with our rights and freedoms. While this viewpoint may resonate with the strong bond between parents and children, it is essential to consider a broader perspective. The wisdom lies in recognizing that advocating for animal rights or questioning certain human behaviors does not equate to a direct attack on individuals’ children. Instead, it aims to foster a more ethical and compassionate approach to our relationship with animals, considering the well-being of current and future generations. By expanding our moral circle to include non-human animals, we can strive for a more harmonious and sustainable coexistence with the natural world, benefiting our children and future generations.
4. Ecologists seek to remake some areas of the world so they would be without humans.
While this perspective may seem controversial, the underlying wisdom lies in recognizing the importance of preserving and protecting natural ecosystems. Ecologists understand that human activities can harm biodiversity, ecological balance, and the planet’s overall health. By advocating for designated areas where human interference is minimized or eliminated, ecologists aim to safeguard fragile ecosystems and allow them to function naturally. This approach acknowledges the need for conservation, restoration, and recognition of intrinsic value in non-human life. It underscores the importance of preserving the diversity and integrity of ecosystems, contributing to the long-term well-being of our planet’s human and non-human inhabitants.
5. Humanity’s survival is in direct conflict with the natural world.
While this perspective may appear bleak, it highlights the wisdom of acknowledging the potential negative impacts of human activities on the environment. It emphasizes that the unchecked pursuit of human progress and development can lead to ecological degradation, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of natural systems. Recognizing this conflict prompts us to seek a harmonious balance between human needs and preserving the natural world. By embracing sustainable practices, conservation efforts, and responsible stewardship, we can mitigate the adverse effects of our actions and strive towards a future where human survival coexists with the health and resilience of the ecosystems on which we depend. The wisdom lies in understanding the interdependence between humanity and nature and the importance of forging a sustainable path forward.
6. Humanity will progress until it can’t, and nature will suffer until it eventually wins.
This viewpoint carries the wisdom of recognizing the finite nature of resources and the potential for ecological repercussions when human actions surpass the capacity of the environment to sustain them. It underscores the importance of considering the long-term implications of our actions and the need for sustainable practices. By understanding the limitations of our growth and development, we can strive for a balance that ensures the well-being of both human society and the natural world. The wisdom lies in acknowledging nature’s ultimate power and resilience and recognizing the importance of working in harmony to secure a sustainable future for humanity and the planet.
7. As the human population continues to explode because of its technology, it must redefine property rights to include nature as having property rights, too, for humanity to survive.
This perspective carries the wisdom of recognizing the interdependence between humanity and nature. By extending property rights to encompass nature, we acknowledge the intrinsic value and rights of the environment. This shift in perspective promotes a more responsible and sustainable approach to resource management. It emphasizes the importance of considering the long-term well-being of both human society and the natural world. By recognizing and respecting the rights of nature, we can strive for more harmonious and balanced coexistence, ensuring the survival and prosperity of future generations.
8. The Earth can support only finite-size humanity with any technology, and eventually, the total population of humans will be reduced to sustainable technology with a sustainable number of people.
The wisdom lies in recognizing the importance of population control and the need to align our numbers with the available resources and the Earth’s carrying capacity. By acknowledging the limits of our planet, we can strive for sustainable technologies and practices that promote a balanced and harmonious coexistence with the natural world. This perspective highlights the necessity of finding a sustainable equilibrium between human needs and the Earth’s capacity to support us. It emphasizes the importance of responsible population management and developing technologies that prioritize long-term sustainability. Ultimately, by aligning our population size with sustainable technology, we can ensure the well-being of both humanity and the planet as a whole.
9. The current positive human population growth rate proves that humanity is progressing. However, the technology is consuming one-time-use resources, some already failing.
The wisdom lies in recognizing that our current technological advancements often rely on the consumption of non-renewable resources, some of which are already dwindling. This highlights the need to prioritize sustainable practices and innovation that promote humanity’s and the planet’s long-term well-being. It calls for a reevaluation of our reliance on one-time-use resources. It encourages the development of environmentally friendly technologies that can preserve resources for future generations. By embracing sustainable approaches, we can ensure a more balanced and resilient path forward that aligns progress with preserving our natural resources.
10. The optimum population is about half the survival rate during unfavorable natural climate fluctuations and other dangerous phenomena.
Garrett Hardin argues that maintaining a population size at approximately half the survival rate is wise to navigate unfavorable natural climate fluctuations and other hazardous events. This perspective emphasizes the importance of resilience and adaptability to environmental challenges. By reducing the population size, there is a higher chance of ensuring the availability of resources and increasing the overall chances of survival during adverse conditions. This viewpoint recognizes the need to balance our population growth with the environment’s capacity to support us, promoting a more sustainable and resilient approach to safeguarding human existence in the face of unpredictable natural phenomena.
11. The social laws that create social responsibility contradict every adult’s desire to survive and reproduce, and therefore long-term survival will require legal coercion.
The wisdom lies in recognizing that long-term survival and well-being necessitate a balance between individual freedoms and collective responsibility. Hardin argues that legal coercion may be required to ensure that societal actions align with the needs of long-term sustainability. This perspective acknowledges that self-interest alone may not always lead to the best outcomes for the greater good. Society can achieve a sustainable future by implementing laws and regulations promoting responsible behavior, such as resource conservation and population control. The wisdom of Hardin’s idea lies in the understanding that legal coercion, in the form of regulations and policies, can help bridge the gap between individual desires and the collective responsibility required for long-term survival and the well-being of humanity and the natural world.
12. The social coercion to save the planet’s ecology must apply to every individual’s right to consume natural resources, survive, and reproduce.
Recognize that collective action is necessary to address environmental issues and ensure the planet’s long-term sustainability. Hardin argues that individual freedoms and desires must be balanced with the greater responsibility of preserving ecological integrity. We can work towards a more equitable distribution of resources and a healthier planet by applying social coercion, such as regulations and societal norms, to limit excessive consumption and promote sustainable practices. This perspective emphasizes the importance of individual accountability and the need for a shared commitment to safeguarding the environment for current and future generations.
13. To coerce every individual to obey the laws requires a worldwide surveillance system that must be acceptable to everyone, even if they hate it.
The wisdom here lies in recognizing the need for effective governance and enforcement mechanisms to ensure societies’ collective well-being and sustainability. Hardin argues that while surveillance may be perceived negatively, it is a means to ensure that individuals adhere to laws crucial for long-term survival and the preservation of resources. This perspective highlights the trade-off between personal freedoms and the greater good, emphasizing the importance of balancing individual desires and the shared responsibility for the common good. It acknowledges that maintaining social order and achieving sustainability often requires collective sacrifices and accepting certain measures, even if they are unpopular or intrusive.
14. An imposition of human laws upon the laws of nature will inevitably fail as every adult will be motivated to cheat by their genetically encoded needs.
The wisdom here lies in recognizing the complex interplay between human behavior, biological instincts, and societal rules. Hardin argues that attempts to regulate human actions in conflict with natural instincts, such as survival and reproduction, will often be met with resistance and non-compliance. This perspective underscores the importance of understanding and working with human nature rather than attempting to override it entirely. It emphasizes the need for strategies that align with our innate drives and motivations, integrating a nuanced understanding of human behavior into designing effective policies and systems. By acknowledging the limitations of imposing laws that contradict fundamental biological needs, we can seek alternative approaches that foster cooperation and behavioral change in a manner compatible with our genetic makeup.
15. By the time a person becomes an adult, their natural sexual inclinations will have activated, and attempting to convince them otherwise will fail.
The wisdom here lies in recognizing the power and persistence of biological drives and instincts, particularly in human sexuality. Hardin argues that attempting to suppress or change these natural inclinations through persuasion or coercion is unlikely to yield significant results. This perspective underscores the importance of understanding and acknowledging the inherent aspects of human nature. It highlights the need for approaches that work with and address these instincts, such as comprehensive sexual education, promoting healthy relationships, and fostering responsible behavior. By embracing a realistic understanding of human sexuality, we can strive for approaches that effectively support individuals in making informed choices and engaging in consensual and responsible sexual behavior.
16. Education, before the sexual instincts take over, might be sufficient to convince a majority of the population, but this education must be applied to every new generation.
Hardin argues that by instilling knowledge and values in each new generation, we can better influence future decisions and actions. This perspective highlights the importance of comprehensive and ongoing education addressing our complex challenges. It emphasizes the need to equip individuals with the information, critical thinking skills, and ethical frameworks necessary to make informed choices that align with broader social and environmental goals. By investing in education for every new generation, we can foster a more knowledgeable and responsible society capable of addressing the complex issues that lie ahead.
17. The asocial person unwilling to comply with world society will find throwing away waste easier than recycling it.
Hardin implies that individuals who do not feel a sense of social responsibility or attachment to the well-being of the collective may be more likely to opt for convenient but environmentally damaging actions. This perspective highlights the importance of fostering a sense of social cohesion and responsibility and promoting sustainable behaviors through education, awareness campaigns, and accessible recycling systems. By addressing individual attitudes and motivations, we can work towards a society that values and prioritizes responsible waste management practices, contributing to the long-term health of the environment.
18. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality, or religion, have the right to marry and create a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during the marriage, and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is society’s natural and fundamental group unit and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
Garrett Hardin’s idea suggests that while the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes the right of individuals to marry and create a family without limitations based on race, nationality, or religion, there are implications regarding population growth and resource allocation. The wisdom lies in understanding that while the right to marriage and family is a fundamental human right, balancing it with the broader challenges of sustainability and responsible resource management is important. Hardin implies that unrestricted population growth can strain the planet’s finite resources and contribute to ecological degradation. Therefore, the wisdom of his idea is in recognizing the need for a nuanced approach that upholds individual rights while also considering the long-term implications for the well-being of both current and future generations. It highlights the importance of balancing personal freedoms and collective responsibility and addressing sustainability concerns within the human rights framework.
19. Using the common wilderness as a cesspool of human waste does no harm because there is low population density, but humans in a mass create indigestible filth for nature.
Garrett Hardin suggests that when the population density is low, using the common wilderness as a dumping ground for human waste may not cause significant harm. However, the wisdom lies in recognizing that the impact on the natural environment becomes more pronounced as population density increases and more humans contribute to waste accumulation. Hardin argues that the accumulation of human waste in large quantities can overwhelm and disrupt natural systems, posing a threat to ecological balance and sustainability. This perspective highlights the need for responsible waste management practices and the consideration of the carrying capacity of ecosystems. It underscores the importance of recognizing that even seemingly harmless actions can have cumulative negative effects as the population grows. The wisdom lies in understanding the long-term consequences of our actions and working towards sustainable solutions that preserve the integrity of the natural world.
20. Each individual pursuing their personal best interest in an open society is on the path that will eventually bring ruin to the whole planet and humanity.
Garrett Hardin’s idea suggests that when individuals solely pursue their self-interest in an open society without considering the broader consequences, it can lead to the eventual destruction of the planet and humanity. The wisdom here lies in recognizing the importance of balancing individual freedoms and interests with collective responsibility. Hardin argues that unchecked pursuit of personal gain, without considering the impacts on the environment, resources, and the well-being of others, can lead to unsustainable practices and the depletion of vital resources. This perspective emphasizes the need for cooperation, ethical decision-making, and the adoption of long-term sustainability as a guiding principle. It highlights the interconnectedness of humanity and the planet, urging us to consider the greater good and work towards a harmonious coexistence that preserves the health and viability of the Earth for future generations.
21. The web of life on Earth is more complex than we can see, so we have a limited ability to project future problems. The ultimate demise of humans and the survival of other life forms is inevitable.
Hardin argues that while humans may face an eventual demise, other life forms will continue to survive. This perspective underscores the importance of humility and a cautious approach when making assumptions about the future. It reminds us of the need to prioritize preserving biodiversity and sustaining ecosystems, recognizing that our actions can have far-reaching consequences. By embracing this wisdom, we can foster a greater sense of responsibility towards the natural world and strive for actions that promote the resilience and well-being of the diverse life forms with which we share the planet.
22. In this time of worldwide communications and ready access to weapons of annihilation, we must find something universal that we can trust that isn’t a hopeless fantasy.
The wisdom here lies in recognizing the urgency of finding common ground and shared values to guide humanity toward a more secure and harmonious future. Hardin implies that relying on unrealistic or unattainable ideals is futile in addressing the challenges of our time. Instead, there is a need to seek pragmatic solutions rooted in understanding and respect for the realities of our complex world. This perspective highlights the importance of fostering genuine dialogue, cooperation, and trust-building based on shared interests and common humanity. By embracing this wisdom, we can work towards a more stable and sustainable global community, acknowledging the realities of our interconnectedness and the need for practical and effective solutions to address the pressing issues we face.
23. The opposition to the ecology movement is based on our human nature, which has evolved into our DNA for billions of years to survive and reproduce.
Hardin implies that our innate drive to secure survival and reproductive success can sometimes clash with ecological preservation and sustainability principles. Understanding this inherent tension helps us appreciate the complexity of our challenges in aligning our behavior with the planet’s long-term well-being. It highlights the need for awareness, education, and collective effort to overcome our instinctual biases and work towards a more harmonious relationship with the natural world. By acknowledging the influence of our evolutionary past, we can seek strategies and solutions that bridge the gap between our natural inclinations and the pressing need for ecological stewardship.
24. In our finite world, the options are (1) to keep expanding humanity until it crashes to extinction or (2) somehow limit the total population to a number that can be sustained permanently.
Garrett Hardin suggests that we are faced with two choices: allowing the human population to continue expanding until it eventually collapses and leads to extinction or finding ways to limit the total population to a sustainable number that can be supported indefinitely. This perspective emphasizes the importance of considering the long-term consequences of unchecked population growth and its strain on limited resources. It calls for responsible and proactive measures to address population control and balance human needs and the environment’s capacity to support them. By acknowledging the need for sustainable population management, we can strive towards a future where human survival and the planet’s well-being are in harmony, avoiding the potentially catastrophic outcomes of an unchecked population growth scenario.
25. Some agreed-upon laws that balance personal rights, private ownership of personal property and real estate, and permanent stability must exist.
Garrett Hardin’s perspective emphasizes the need for legal frameworks considering the broader implications of individual actions on society and the environment. Hardin implies that such laws should prioritize sustainable practices, responsible resource management, and preserving stability for future generations. By finding a harmonious balance between personal freedoms and collective well-being, we can create a framework that ensures the long-term sustainability of both society and the natural world. The wisdom of this idea lies in recognizing the importance of legal systems that promote fairness, accountability, and the preservation of essential resources for the benefit of current and future generations.
26. The current legal definitions of private property encourage the total consumption of privately-owned natural resources and converting all habitats into private money and consumed trash.
Garrett Hardin’s wisdom here lies in recognizing the unintended consequences of how property rights are defined and enforced. Hardin implies that the existing framework may not adequately account for the long-term ecological impacts of unchecked resource exploitation and the degradation of natural habitats. This perspective highlights the need for reevaluating and reforming the legal definitions of private property to align with sustainable practices and responsible stewardship of natural resources. By promoting a more balanced approach that considers preserving and conserving the environment, we can work towards a future where private property rights coexist with the broader imperative of maintaining a healthy and thriving planet for future generations.
27. Because it is impossible to control every individual with the suggestions of ethical behavior, there must be enforceable laws and punishments for illegal behavior.
Garrett Hardin’s idea suggests that due to the impossibility of controlling every individual’s ethical behavior, there is a need for enforceable laws and punishments for illegal actions. The wisdom here lies in recognizing the importance of a legal framework that sets clear boundaries and consequences for behavior against society’s collective well-being or sustainability. Hardin implies that relying solely on ethical suggestions or appeals to individual conscience may not be sufficient to ensure responsible behavior. By establishing enforceable laws and penalties, we can deter and address harmful actions, promoting accountability and discouraging behaviors that harm others or the environment. This perspective emphasizes the importance of a legal system that supports a harmonious coexistence, upholds shared values, and protects the long-term interests of society and the planet.
28. The currently wealthy people will fight against every imposition on their privileges and use their money to prevent an ecologically sustainable world.
Garrett Hardin’s idea suggests recognizing the potential challenges posed by the entrenched interests of the wealthy and their resistance to change. Hardin implies that those with significant financial resources may use their influence to maintain the status quo, even if it goes against the planet’s and future generations long-term well-being. This perspective highlights the need for systemic change and collective action to overcome the barriers created by concentrated wealth and power. It underscores the importance of challenging and reshaping economic systems to promote sustainability, equity, and the common good. By recognizing these challenges, we can work towards creating a more equitable and ecologically sustainable world that addresses the needs of both current and future generations.
29. In the end, environmentalists want a lot of the Earth to be wilderness, with only sporadic small, isolated groups of people allowed to enter on foot.
Hardin implies that we can safeguard those regions’ biodiversity and ecological balance by designating areas as wilderness and limiting human impact. This perspective highlights the need to strike a balance between human activities and the preservation of pristine natural areas. It emphasizes the wisdom of protecting vulnerable ecosystems and allowing them to function naturally while acknowledging the need for sustainable human interaction and responsible resource management in other areas. By embracing this approach, we can work towards conserving biodiversity and the planet’s long-term health, ensuring that future generations can appreciate and benefit from the natural wonders our Earth offers.
Some ideas for creating a graphic for Garrett Hardin.
2. Any individual can deny that they have obligations to the future other than to survive, reproduce, and care for their offspring.
5. Humanity’s survival is in direct conflict with the natural world.
10. The optimum population is about half the survival rate during unfavorable natural climate fluctuations and other dangerous phenomena.
13. To coerce every individual to obey the laws requires a worldwide surveillance system that must be acceptable to everyone, even if they hate it.
14. An imposition of human laws upon the laws of nature will inevitably fail as every adult will be motivated to cheat by their genetically encoded needs.
18. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality, or religion, have the right to marry and create a family.
22. In this time of worldwide communications and ready access to weapons of annihilation, we must find something universal that we can trust that isn’t a hopeless fantasy.
26. The current legal definitions of private property encourage the total consumption of privately-owned natural resources and converting all habitats into private money and consumed trash.
27. Because it is impossible to control every individual with the suggestions of ethical behavior, there must be enforceable laws and punishments for illegal behavior.
28. The currently wealthy people will fight against every imposition on their privileges and use their money to prevent an ecologically sustainable world.
2. Any individual can deny that they have obligations to the future other than to survive, reproduce, and care for their offspring.
14. An imposition of human laws upon the laws of nature will inevitably fail as every adult will be motivated to cheat by their genetically encoded needs.
18. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality, or religion, have the right to marry and create a family.
26. The current legal definitions of private property encourage the total consumption of privately-owned natural resources and converting all habitats into private money and consumed trash.
The population expands to the food supply and then drops below it until the population can resume its growth. Photo by Kevin Carter.
Probaway - Life Hacks 