Go to the Index of 120 Philosophers Squared
Derek Parfit (1942 – 2017) was a British philosopher who specialized in problems of personal identity, rationality, ethics, and the relations among them. No question is more sublime than why there is a Universe: why there is anything rather than nothing.
Probaway maximizing on Derek Parfit
1. The Universe needs for humanity to survive our current state and create resource stability to increase the self-consciousness of the Universe.
2. We carbon-burning people must stop overheating the atmosphere and bring our population back into a sustainable balance with resources.
3. Without us, the Universe would not contain any known rational beings, there would be no rational truths, and nothing would value the Universe that created us.
4. We are possibly neglecting our future species value because of the media’s failure to forecast our present actions’ inevitable results.
5. To be a person, an entity must be aware of itself and its non-self surroundings and its continued existence through time via reproduction.
6. What am I, or you, or humanity other than elaborate sentience generated by sophisticated languages that are now understood by Google?
7. Though everything is identical with itself, only I am aware of myself, and I grant that you too are probably aware of yourself.
8. In the past, my life seemed like a glass tunnel separating me from the world but as I approached the darkness at the end it resolved into a void.
9. When we know why something is true, we don’t need to ask why this thing is true. If we accept that 1 + 0 = 0 + 1, don’t we know 1 = 1?
10. Why does the Universe exist? Is the Universe conscious of itself? If so, how can I communicate with it, and if not, what can I do to make it so?
11. Is looking forward to a probably pleasurable experience better than looking back at it, or even better progressing toward it with actions, or carrying away a trophy, or showing off the trophy?
12. Philosophers should not only interpret our beliefs; when they are true, they should support and enable them, and when false, prove it and stop their harmful effects.
13. If there is a reason why something isn’t done, give me the reason. But if there is no reason, don’t attempt to stop me from doing it.
14. If too many people took buckets of sand away from a beautiful beach to improve their own gardens, would the beach soon be ugly?
15. In a few years, I shall be dead, but all that means is that the future world’s experiences will no longer be linked to this brain.
16. I know that it is irrational to get angry at cranky material objects like my computer, and knowing that, it is easier not to get angry at people.
17. Utilitarian hedonism works for me because the sum of happiness has been greater than the sum of my suffering so far.
18. We cannot predict if we might someday develop ethics upon which we all agree and obey, but it’s not irrational to have that hope.
COMMENTS on Derek Parfit
I was intrigued by Parfit’s comment, What now matters most is that we avoid ending human history, because that has been a major problem for me too. So far as I know, he didn’t do anything particular to save humanity, and I did many things. None of mine were particularly successful, so far as I know, but I did them and we are still here.
He also wrote, What now matters most is that we rich people give up some of our luxuries, … Let the repeat go, but we all want to live our lives as best we can, and for most of us, that includes physical things that consume nature’s resources. The problem isn’t that we individually consume too much for the Earth to support; the problem is there is an overabundance of us, and the human population is exploding to where the Earth can’t sustain us for very much longer. Science to the rescue? Maybe?
That is where his statement, We might neglect our future selves because of some failure of belief or imagination, becomes meaningful because it appears that human beings collectively cannot solve their population problem without stressing some resource to the failure point. When that natural problem has been encountered historically, a population collapses, usually from wars that precipitate a widespread famine. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse in order: War, Disease, Famine, Death.
There is a popular idea circulating lately here in Bend that the only moment in time that is relevant is now, now, now … now. It is coupled with a statement totally discounting any future. Parfit says, To be a person, a being must be self-conscious, aware of its identity and its continued existence over time. With his statement requiring a person’s awareness of its continued existence over time, he thrusts all of these living people into the abyss of non-personhood. Well, Parfit died a couple of days ago so he can’t argue the point anymore, but I agree with him.
It’s a good reason for postponing pleasures then you will then have more time in which you can enjoy looking forward to them. It’s statements like that that make people hesitant to follow philosophers. We have experiences where not taking a pleasure when it is available means the possibility of having it goes away and is lost to us forever. We arrange our investments in pleasures such that depriving ourselves of a small pleasure in the present now will reliably bring a greater pleasure in the foreseeable future now.
It seems that many people are led astray by believing without proof what Parfit said is always true, that —
When we know why something is true, we don’t need to ask why this thing is true.




